Software architecture & strategy

Before you sink a lot of money into an architecture that won't carry the load — or when the team notices features taking longer and longer to ship. A review typically runs one to two weeks and delivers a prioritised roadmap, not just a list of problems.

Usually a modular monolith, until growth genuinely justifies microservices. We see too many projects start with microservices and suffocate in distributed complexity. The call is made case-by-case against actual scaling and team realities.

Identification and prioritisation of debt, then continuous reduction baked into the sprint plan — no big-bang refactor. We turn implicit, dangerous debt into documented, controllable debt that gets paid down step by step.

Software erosion is the gradual decay of an originally clean architecture under the pressure of changing requirements. We address it with Architecture Decision Records, architecture tests in CI, and regular reviews — preventive rather than reactive.

Yes. We assess architecture decisions from an outside perspective — typically two to five days with a concrete assessment report. Risks are named clearly without us auto-pitching for follow-up work.